Let's break down how to use the word "disabled" respectfully and accurately in English. It's a word that has a complex history and evolving usage, so it's important to be mindful.
1. Traditionally, "Disabled" as an Adjective:
- Historically: For a long time, "disabled" was used almost exclusively as an adjective to describe people – "a disabled person," "a disabled child." This was common, but increasingly viewed as outdated and medicalizing.
- Example: "The disabled child needed special assistance." (Still acceptable, but consider alternatives).
2. The Preferred Term: "Person with a Disability"
- Why the Shift? The shift to "person with a disability" is rooted in the disability rights movement. The core idea is that disability is a characteristic of a person, not their entire identity. It focuses on the person first, not the condition.
- Example: "The person with a disability is a talented athlete." (This is generally considered the most respectful and preferred phrasing).
3. When "Disabled" is Still Acceptable (and Sometimes Necessary):
- Referring to a Specific Condition: In some contexts, “disabled” is perfectly fine when describing the specific condition causing the disability, without defining the person solely by that condition.
- Example: "The research focuses on disabling conditions like cerebral palsy." (Here, it’s about the condition, not the person)
- Example: "The building is accessible to disabled people." (Referring to features that accommodate the condition).
- Legal Documents & Official Contexts: Legal documents, forms, and official records often still use "disabled" for consistency and for reasons related to data collection and tracking.
- Specific Disabilities: Sometimes, it's common to use "disabled" when referring to a specific disability type.
- Example: “A disabled veteran” (This is generally accepted). “A disabled driver”
4. Important Considerations & Best Practices:
- Person-First Language: Always prioritize person-first language (“person with a disability” rather than “disabled person”). This emphasizes the individual's humanity.
- Ask for Preference: If you're unsure, ask the person how they prefer to be described. This shows respect. "How do you prefer to be referred to?" is a good starting point.
- Avoid Euphemisms: Words like "handicapped," "suffering from," or "invalid" are considered outdated and often offensive. They can be seen as pitying or infantilizing.
- Context Matters: Consider the context of your communication. A formal report might still use "disabled," while a casual conversation should generally use "person with a disability."
- Focus on Abilities: When possible, highlight a person’s skills and accomplishments rather than dwelling solely on their disability.
5. Related Terms:
- Individuals with Disabilities: A more formal and widely accepted alternative to "disabled people."
- Disabled Community: This term emphasizes the social and cultural aspects of disability.
- Accessibility: Focuses on making environments and services usable by everyone, regardless of disability.
Resources for More Information:
In summary, “person with a disability” is the generally preferred and most respectful way to refer to someone with a disability. However, “disabled” can be appropriate in certain contexts when describing the condition itself, and always prioritize asking the individual how they prefer to be described.
Do you want me to elaborate on any specific aspect of this, such as:
- Specific situations where “disabled” might be acceptable?
- How to use “disabled” in writing (e.g., reports, articles)?
- The history of the term “disabled”?
Comment ()